Skip to content

Can the royal family recover from their Kate Middleton PR crisis? Here’s what one
expert thinks is the way forward

“It’s kind of remarkable how badly this was done,” Northeastern professor Peter Mancusi says about the handling of Middleton’s illness.

Prince William wearing a suit and Princess Kate wearing a red dress and red hat.
The Royal Family can only find their way out of their current PR crisis with transparency said Northeastern professor Peter Mancusi. Chris Jackson/Pool Photo via AP, File

Queen Elizabeth II’s public relations strategy over her 70-year reign was “never complain, never explain.” But Britain’s royal family has taken a different tactic when it comes to the recent drama over the Princess of Wales, one a Northeastern expert said they should reconsider.

There’s been heavy speculation about the well-being of the Princess of Wales, commonly known as Kate Middleton, since Kensington Palace announced on Jan. 17 that she had undergone planned abdominal surgery the day prior and would be hospitalized for 10 to 14 days and absent from public duties until Easter. The intrigue reached a fever pitch on March 10 when wire services retracted the first photo Kensington Palace posted of Middleton and her children since the surgery, saying it was too altered to run.

Middleton apologized, saying it was a result of her experimenting with editing. But many people did not believe the Princess of Wales was editing her own photos, inspiring more conspiracies over Middleton, who hasn’t been seen in public since Christmas. There’s now rumors abound about her current condition, the state of her marriage and the family as a whole.

The only way out of this PR nightmare for the royal family is to embrace transparency, said Peter Mancusi, an associate teaching professor of journalism at Northeastern University and crisis management expert.

“The irony is that the more you resist doing things to answer people’s questions, the more likely it is that that’s what you’ll have to do anyways,” Mancusi said. “The hiding seems excessive and it’s resulting in all these questions. They’ve helped create the obsession of this. … It’s kind of remarkable how badly this was done.”

Headshot of Peter Mancusi.
Peter Mancusi, associate teaching professor of journalism at Northeastern, said the Royal Family bungled their handling of the Princess of Wales’ surgery. Photo by Alyssa Stone/Northeastern University

The photo was released after more than a month of speculation about Middleton. People were surprised about the initial announcement and her recovery time. But concern grew as royal watchers also noticed a difference in the palace’s PR strategy around Middleton.

Former Buzzfeed royal correspondent Ellie Hall did an interview with Nieman Lab in which she pointed out there’s a lack of “fluffy, low-stakes” stories about how Middleton is recovering — stories the palace might normally push when a royal is in this position.The palace also began addressing rumors about her condition, something it didn’t do previously. There were no social media posts and no public hospital visits from her family.

In contrast, papers ran photos of Queen Camilla visiting King Charles III when he was in the hospital being treated for an enlarged prostate. After the king announced that he was diagnosed with cancer, there were social media posts of him looking over cards the public sent and he has made some appearances since then.

Mancusi said that while the palace did say Middleton was going to be out until Easter, the information it initially released caused enough concern that people want assurance that Middleton is well, especially given she’s a young mother. People are also aware how much the royal family works with the press since Prince Harry’s revelations in his 2023 memoir, “Spare,” and thus wonder if the palace is involved in the lack of coverage.

“If they do something that they haven’t done before, that’s going to raise questions,” Mancusi said. “(King Charles) is making public appearances and he’s out there, so this just seems odd. There is an obvious difference. She’s entitled to privacy, but she’s the future queen consort. … I don’t think it’s feasible (to be so private) in the 21st century where you have all the social media and a lot of people commenting on what the royals are up to. They can maintain some privacy, but … a lot of people are asking questions.”

Northeastern Global News, in your inbox.

Sign up for NGN’s daily newsletter for news, discovery and analysis from around the world.